Why Every AI Agent In Your Company Needs An Identity

At 2:14 on a Tuesday morning, an internal agent at a mid-sized logistics firm opened a support ticket, pulled a customer export, and pushed a config change to staging. Every one of those actions was permitted. Nobody could say who permitted them. The token it used belonged to a service account created in 2023 by an engineer who left the company in 2024, and the audit log recorded the actor as "automation-prod-07".

That is not a security failure in the way most boards understand the phrase. Nothing was breached. The system worked exactly as configured. It is an accountability failure, and it is now sitting inside a standards process at NIST rather than inside a vendor pitch deck.

AI agents are getting production access faster than anyone is issuing them identities. NIST opened a formal track on agent identity and authorization in February 2026. Enterprises that cannot name the human behind an agent action will fail their next audit, not their next penetration test.

Why this matters now

The industry already solved machine identity once. Workloads got certificates and CI runners got short-lived tokens, and everyone quietly agreed that a long-lived API key sitting in a repository was embarrassing. That model holds because a workload does one thing forever. An agent does not. It decides. It picks which tool to call and when to escalate. The thing it decides to do at 2am was not in the ticket that authorized it.

So the common advice, which is to give each agent a service account and move on, is wrong. Not slightly wrong. A service account answers "what is running." Agent identity has to answer four questions instead, and NIST wrote them down almost that plainly: what exactly is the agent, who delegated authority to it, what is it allowed to do, and how are its actions logged and constrained. The governance frameworks that decide which enterprises win with agents all assume those four answers exist. Almost nobody has them.

In February 2026 NIST's Center for AI Standards and Innovation announced the AI Agent Standards Initiative, with agent security and identity as one of three named workstreams. Alongside it the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence published a draft concept paper, "Accelerating the Adoption of Software and AI Agent Identity and Authorization," and closed public comment on 2 April 2026. It does not invent a protocol. It stretches the ones already in the building: OAuth 2.1, OpenID Connect, SPIFFE and SPIRE for workload attestation, SCIM for lifecycle, NGAC for attribute-based access, and the Model Context Protocol for tool access. And it is blunt about the part vendors skip, asking how to bind agent identity to human identity for on-behalf-of scenarios, and demanding that agents log their actions and intent in a tamper-proof and verifiable manner. Meanwhile the credential surface underneath all of this keeps expanding, and the certificate rules governing it keep tightening on a schedule that has nothing to do with AI and no interest in waiting for it, which is the same structural pressure driving the post-quantum migration deadlines already running against your encrypted traffic.

Certificate lifetime

200 days

Ceiling since 15 March 2026

Shadow AI breach premium

USD 670,000

Added to average breach cost

Secrets leaked publicly

28.65 million

New on public GitHub in 2025

Machine to human ratio

109 to 1

Identities per employee today

The certificate number is the one that should worry an operations lead, because it is the only figure on that grid that is a hard deadline rather than a trend. The ceiling drops again in March 2027 and lands under seven weeks in March 2029, and at that point the window for reusing domain validation data shrinks to ten days. Manual renewal stops being slow and starts being impossible. Any agent that terminates or initiates TLS on your behalf inherits that clock, and if you cannot enumerate which agents hold which credentials, you cannot rotate them on the schedule the rules now require.

"

You are running more than a hundred non-human actors for every person on payroll, and almost none of them can tell you which human signed off on what they did last night.

What identity for an agent actually means

Strip away the protocol names and agent identity decomposes into six practical obligations. None of them is exotic. All of them are things your existing IAM stack does for humans and mostly fails to do for software that makes choices. The table below is the working checklist, and it is deliberately written as what you have to be able to prove, not what you have to buy.

Category	Detail	Insight
Identification	Model, version, tool set, owning team	A name is not an identity
Authentication	Attested workload credentials, not static keys	Short lived beats secret and shared
Delegation	On-behalf-of chain back to a person	Authority must have a human origin
Authorization	Scope bound to task, not role	Least privilege per job, per run
Audit	Tamper-evident record of action and intent	Non-repudiation is the actual deliverable
Lifecycle	Provisioning, rotation, revocation on exit	Kill it faster than you built it

Read down the Insight column and the pattern is uncomfortable. Five of the six obligations are things you can implement today with protocols that shipped years ago. Only the audit row really needs new work, because logging an agent's intent, meaning why it chose the action, is not something any existing standard captures well. That is where the standards effort will actually spend its time, and it is also the row your regulator will ask about first.

The NIST agent identity track moved from announcement to closed comment periods in seven weeks during early 2026, and the next milestone is a draft project description rather than a finished standard.

Where this breaks in practice

The first breakage is organisational, not technical. Identity lives with the security team, agents live with the platform or data team, and the person who actually authorized the agent to touch a customer record is a product manager who has never seen an IAM console. Palo Alto Networks' 2026 identity security survey of more than 2,900 security decision-makers found that disconnected identity systems add roughly 12 hours to the average identity-related incident. That gap is not spent fixing anything. It is spent asking who owns this thing.

The second breakage is that agents multiply credentials as a side effect of being useful. Every tool an agent connects to wants a key. Every connector config file becomes a place a key can sit. This is the same failure pattern that made verified caller identity such a fight in telecom, where operators had to be pushed into displaying the KYC name behind a number before anyone could trust who was calling. The lesson transferred badly. We are once again shipping systems that act on our behalf without a verified name attached.

And here is the part I am not sure about, which is worth saying out loud rather than hiding behind a framework. Should an agent hold a first-class identity of its own, or should it only ever borrow a human's? Giving it its own identity makes revocation clean and audit trails honest, but it also creates a permanent non-human principal that outlives the reason it existed. Borrowing keeps accountability tight and makes the agent disappear when the human leaves, but it collapses the moment an agent runs unattended for a week. I lean toward first-class identity with a mandatory delegation link, but I would not call that settled, and anyone selling you certainty on this in 2026 is selling.

Watch-outs before you buy anything:

• Any vendor claiming NIST compliance for agent identity is claiming compliance with a concept paper. There is no standard to comply with yet.
• Inventory before policy. If you cannot list every agent and the credentials it holds, a policy engine just enforces rules against the half you know about.
• Logging the action without logging the delegation is worthless. "Agent X deleted the record" is not an audit trail. "Agent X, acting for Priya, deleted the record under ticket 4471" is.
• Treat agent credentials as in-scope for your certificate automation programme now, not after the next validity cut lands.

Key takeaways

01. Access control, not model quality, is where agent deployments fail. IBM's 2025 breach research found 97% of breached organisations that suffered an AI-related security incident said they lacked proper AI access controls.

02. The credential surface is growing faster than the agents are. Leaked AI-service secrets on public repositories rose 81% year over year in GitGuardian's 2026 count, outpacing the overall secrets growth rate.

03. Start with the delegation link. It is the only obligation on the checklist that no tool can retrofit for you, because the record of who authorized what has to be captured at the moment it happens.

Pick your three highest-privilege agents this week, and for each one write down the human who authorized it, the exact scope it holds, and where its actions are logged. If you cannot complete that sentence for all three, you do not have an agent identity problem to plan for later. You have one now, and it is already in production.

Harvest Now Decrypt Later: Your Encrypted Data Is Already Stolen

A batch of your company's traffic left the building this morning. It was encrypted, so nobody logged it as an incident. And somewhere it may now be sitting on a disk in a facility you will never see, waiting. Not for a stolen password. For a machine that does not exist yet.

Attackers are storing encrypted traffic today to decrypt once quantum hardware matures. NIST has already set the clock: RSA and elliptic curve go deprecated after 2030 and disallowed after 2035. Data with a long confidentiality life is exposed now, not later. Start the inventory this quarter.

Why It Matters

The attack has a name that sounds almost polite. Harvest now, decrypt later. An adversary, usually state-sponsored, quietly copies encrypted traffic and archives it. No malware, no ransom note, no alert. They are not trying to read it this year. They are betting that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer arrives before the value of that data expires, and for a lot of records that bet is a comfortable one.

Here is where most security budgets get it wrong. Teams treat post-quantum work as a 2030 problem because that is the first date on the NIST calendar, and 2030 feels like somebody else's fiscal year. But the exposure window opened the day the traffic was captured, not the day it gets decrypted. If you handle records that must stay confidential for fifteen years, your deadline already passed. I would go further: for anything covered by long-retention regulation, the decision to defer migration is a decision to accept an eventual breach, just one you will not have to explain until after you have left the job. That is a governance failure dressed up as a scheduling call, and it belongs on the same risk register as the accountability gaps in enterprise AI agent deployments that boards spent the first half of this year arguing about.

The hardware side is no longer speculative either. Banks and pharmaceutical firms are already buying processing time on commercial systems, a shift covered in more detail in this breakdown of what quantum computing actually means for business leaders. Nobody serious claims a machine can break RSA-2048 today. The point is that the archive does not care about today.

Money makes the scale legible in a way that threat modelling never does. Look at what one government alone expects to spend just to swap its own algorithms.

Final Deadline

2035

Legacy algorithms fully disallowed

Federal Migration Cost

$7.1 billion

Civilian agencies only, excludes defence

Practitioners Surveyed

4,000+

IT and security roles worldwide

Actively Preparing

38%

Down from the prior year

The cost estimate comes from the congressionally mandated OMB and ONCD report to Congress, covering United States federal civilian systems in 2024 dollars (as of 2024). It deliberately leaves out national security systems and the entire commercial sector. Read it as a floor, not a ceiling. What it really measures is not licence fees but archaeology: the labour of finding every place a cryptographic primitive was hardcoded by someone who left in 2014. The preparation rate, drawn from the 2026 Entrust and Ponemon Institute global study, moved the wrong way against the prior year, which tells you budget pressure is beating deadline pressure right now.

“

One government put $7.1 billion against swapping its own algorithms, and that estimate covers civilian systems alone. Whatever your number is, you have not budgeted it yet.

The standards themselves are settled, so the usual excuse about waiting for the technology to mature no longer holds. Here is the state of play.

Category	Detail	Insight
The standards	FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA), FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)	Finalised in 2024, ready to deploy
Deprecation date	RSA, ECDH, ECDSA, DSA and FFDH deprecated after 2030	Continued use needs documented risk justification
Certificate visibility	43% report full insight into their own certificates	Most teams cannot see what breaks
Operational pain	68% call managing cryptographic assets extremely difficult	A tooling gap, not awareness gap
Highest-risk data	Regulated records, intellectual property, health data, identity records	Confidentiality outlives the encryption protecting it
The attack	Collection is passive and leaves no trace on your network	No breach alarm ever fires

Read that table as a sequencing document. Rows three and four are the real project; rows one and two are the easy part everyone talks about instead. So why is the work stalling? The reasons people actually give are boring, and boring reasons are the ones that win.

Budget was cited by 39% of respondents and missing expertise by 38%, both up sharply on the prior year in the same Entrust and Ponemon study.

Friction Points

The migration itself is not the hard part. Swapping a TLS library is a Tuesday. Finding every system that quietly depends on a certificate nobody documented is a two-year archaeological dig, and that discovery work is what the money is really paying for. Every embedded device, every code-signing key, every hardware security module, every vendor integration where the crypto lives on their side of the contract and not yours.

There is one question nobody in this field can answer honestly, and it deserves saying plainly rather than hiding behind a confidence interval. Nobody knows when a cryptographically relevant quantum computer arrives. Estimates run from the early 2030s to never. That uncertainty is not a reason to wait, it is the reason the deadline exists at all: regulators picked 2035 precisely because the honest answer is a shrug, and a shrug is not something you can build a control around. Reasonable, well-informed people disagree about this, and they will keep disagreeing right up until somebody publishes a result.

Practical watch-outs before you scope the work:

• Vendor claims of being quantum-ready usually mean the product supports a hybrid mode, not that your deployment uses it. Ask which algorithm is negotiated in production.
• Certificate lifetimes are shrinking independently of quantum concerns. If your renewal process is manual, that breaks first, and it breaks loudly.
• Long-lived signing keys, especially firmware and code-signing, are worse than transport encryption. You cannot re-sign a device already in a customer's hands.
• Regulatory sequencing bites. Mandated technical standards land on their own timetable regardless of your roadmap, a pattern already visible in fights over mandating universal OBD access across car brands.
• Data you already sent is not covered by anything you do next. Migration protects future traffic only.

Key Takeaways

• Inventory before you migrate. You cannot replace an algorithm you have not located, and the discovery phase dominates the timeline.
• Rank by confidentiality lifetime, not by system importance. A dull archive of health records outranks a busy internal dashboard.
• Build crypto-agility, not a one-time swap. Whatever replaces today's choice will itself need replacing, and the second migration should cost a fraction of the first.
• Put the risk acceptance in writing now. After the deprecation date, that documentation stops being optional, and drafting it late is how audits go badly.

Pull your certificate inventory this quarter and sort it by how long each dataset has to stay secret, not by how busy the system is. That single sorted list is the whole project plan, and the teams that have one are already ahead of the clear majority who have not started.

Macbook Pro: Need for improved Durability & resiliency for price

Owning a MacBook Pro is a badge of honor for many creatives and professionals, offering unparalleled performance and reliability. However, alongside its hefty price tag comes the frustration of maintaining this premium device. In this article, we'll explore the challenges faced by MacBook Pro owners and why Apple should prioritize enhancing its durability to protect against accidental damage.

The Maintenance Dilemma:

MacBook Pro laptops are synonymous with excellence, but their maintenance presents a significant challenge for users. Here's why:

• Expensive Repairs: Even minor accidents, such as a bump or spill, can result in costly repairs, with screen replacements and motherboard repairs draining your wallet.
• Fragile Design: Despite its sleek and elegant design, the MacBook Pro is susceptible to damage from everyday wear and tear, leading to cracked screens and damaged internals.
• Limited Protection: Unlike some rival laptops, the MacBook Pro lacks robust durability features such as water resistance and reinforced displays, leaving it vulnerable to accidents.

The Case for Durability:

Enhancing the durability of the MacBook Pro is not just about protecting your investment; it's about ensuring a seamless user experience. Here's why Apple should prioritize durability:

• Protection Against Accidents: IP67 water resistance and dust resistance would safeguard the MacBook Pro against spills and environmental hazards, providing peace of mind for users.
• Long-Term Investment: By investing in durability features, Apple can extend the lifespan of MacBook Pro laptops, ensuring they remain functional and reliable for years to come.
• Enhanced User Experience: A MacBook Pro that is resistant to accidents and damage offers a better user experience, allowing professionals to focus on their work without worrying about the fragility of their device.
• Brand Loyalty: By listening to customer feedback and addressing concerns about durability, Apple can strengthen brand loyalty and retain customers who value both performance and reliability.

The Road Ahead:

As Apple continues to innovate with its MacBook Pro lineup, there is an opportunity to prioritize durability alongside performance. Here's how Apple can enhance the durability of MacBook Pro laptops:

• IP67 Water Resistance: Integrate IP67 water resistance into MacBook Pro models to protect against spills and accidental exposure to liquids.
• Ceramic Shield Display: Implement ceramic shield technology for MacBook Pro displays to improve durability and resistance to scratches and cracks.
• Ruggedized Design: Explore options for a more ruggedized design that can withstand the rigors of daily use, including reinforced chassis and impact-resistant materials.
• User Education: Educate users about proper care and maintenance practices to minimize the risk of accidental damage and prolong the lifespan of their MacBook Pro.

Conclusion:

As MacBook Pro laptops continue to be the preferred choice for creatives and professionals, addressing the maintenance dilemma is essential for Apple's reputation and customer satisfaction. By prioritizing durability features such as IP67 water resistance and ceramic shield displays, Apple can enhance the longevity and reliability of MacBook Pro laptops, ensuring they remain the pinnacle of performance and craftsmanship in the laptop market. It's time for Apple to invest in durability and protect the investment of MacBook Pro owners worldwide.

Resolving Purchase Date mismatch for Your New Apple Device

Buying a new Apple device is akin to unwrapping a tech treasure, but what happens when the trusty Apple support coverage page throws a curveball with an incorrect purchase date? In this guide, we'll unravel the mystery behind this glitch, explore its potential implications, and walk you through the steps to rectify the purchase date hiccup, ensuring your Apple ownership journey is as seamless as possible.

Apple Support Coverage Decoding Purchase Date Glitches

• Foundation: Trusting the Purchase Date - For Apple enthusiasts, the Apple support coverage page is a digital sanctuary, a place to verify the authenticity of their device and ensure the validity of the purchase date. However, the peacefulness can be disrupted by unexpected errors, technical glitches, or the dread of an invoice mismatch, leading to an incorrect purchase date. While it might not seem like a major concern initially, the ripple effects could be significant, especially when it comes to hardware or battery issues.
• Why and How of Incorrect Purchase Dates - Understanding why an incorrect purchase date might occur is the first step. Technical hiccups, errors in data entry, or invoice mismatches can all contribute to this discrepancy. The key is not to panic but to take proactive steps to rectify the situation and ensure your device's support coverage is accurate.

Correcting the Course: Methods to Rectify Purchase Date Errors

• Support App, Toll-Free Calls, and the Power of Email: If you find yourself in the tangle of an incorrect purchase date, fear not; there are paths to resolution. Apple provides multiple channels for correction, starting with the support app. Contacting Apple support through their toll-free number is another avenue, but be armed with your valid invoice bill. The preferred and often effective method is resolving the issue over a phone call. However, if rejection persists, it's time to escalate.
• Escalation Tactic: Contacting Senior Technical Advisors - When the standard support channels or support executive was not able to help, requesting assistance from a senior technical advisor becomes paramount. Plead your case, present your valid invoice, and articulate the urgency of correcting the purchase date. This step often leads to a successful resolution, but what if it doesn't?
• Last Resort: Emailing Apple Senior Executives - For those rare instances where conventional methods fall short, a strategic email to Apple's senior executives might be the ace up your sleeve. While finding their email addresses requires some internet sleuthing and research, it can be a game-changer when all else fails.

Tips and Tricks: Navigating the purchase date Resolution Journey

• Holding Your Ground and Staying Resilient: The resolution journey may have its twists and turns. To increase your chances of success, ensure you have all necessary documentation, speak clearly during phone calls, and persist if initial attempts fall short. Remember, the goal is not just to rectify the purchase date but to fortify your device's support coverage for the long haul.
• When Patience Pays Off - Apple support is known for its customer-centric approach. If patience and persistence characterize your resolution journey, you'll likely find success. The key is to view the process as a partnership – you and Apple working together to ensure your device gets the support it deserves.

Navigating the jumble of an incorrect purchase date on the Apple support coverage page might seem daunting but armed with the right knowledge and a dash of perseverance, you can crack the code. Remember, your Apple ownership experience should be smooth, and rectifying purchase date glitches is just a step towards ensuring your device gets the care it deserves. So, the next time the digital puzzle throws you a curveball, you'll be ready to unravel it and continue enjoying the technological marvel that is your Apple device.

Simplify Your Digital Life: The Magic of Passkeys

In our digital age, passwords are the keys to our online kingdom. But if you're like me, you've probably had your fair share of password-related headaches. Complex, unique passwords for every account, and the nightmare of resetting them when you forget – it's a digital ordeal. But what if I told you there's a game-changer on the horizon? Allow me to introduce you to passkeys – the future of online security.

The Password Puzzle: A Constant Struggle

• Password Maze: The average person has over a hundred online accounts, from emails to social media to online banking. Each of these accounts, for security reasons, demands a unique and complex password. Remembering these passwords can feel like navigating a maze blindfolded.
• Password Fatigue: The relentless need to create, remember, and frequently change complex passwords is a source of frustration and fatigue. This often results in people using weak passwords or the same password across multiple sites - a security nightmare.

Passkeys: A Login Game Changer

• A Seamless Experience: Enter Passkeys - The way we access our Google accounts has been revolutionized. Passkeys are a godsend for anyone weary of remembering a dozen different complex passwords. Instead, they offer a streamlined, hassle-free login experience.
• The Hope for the Future: The success of Passkeys for Google accounts begs the question: when will the rest of the digital world catch up? Banking, office apps, and other IT giants, we're looking at you. 

Road Ahead: Passkeys in Everyday Life

• Making Online Banking a Breeze: Online banking, a realm of multi-layered security, is ripe for a passkey revolution. It promises the end of remembering unique PINs and internet banking passwords every 180 days or a year.
• Revolutionizing Office Apps: From accessing your email to collaborating on cloud documents, work-related apps can benefit from the simplicity and security of passkeys.
• Future of IT Solutions: Leading IT solution providers should soon plan for adoption of passkeys as their authentication mechanism. Soon, for users experiencing IT solutions the cumbersome password management will soon be a relic of the past.

Conclusion: A Passkey-Powered Tomorrow

The arrival of Passkeys has set a new standard for online security and user experience. It's a game-changer in a world where digital security is paramount. The days of wracking your brain to remember if your password contains an uppercase 'P' or a lowercase 'p' are fading. The success story with Google accounts is just the beginning. We hope that soon, leading IT solution providers and banking systems will join the Passkey revolution. With Passkeys, we're not just simplifying the login process; we're revolutionizing digital security. So, the next time you log in without the password struggle, you'll know the future of digital security has arrived.

Importance of Ceramic Shield protection for MacBook Displays

MacBook displays are susceptible to damage, and even a minor accident can result in cracks, leading to costly repair bills. In this article, we explore a potential solution to this problem by proposing that Apple adopts the iPhone's ceramic shield technology to protect MacBook displays.

Vulnerability to Damage: A Costly Concern
MacBook displays are known for their vibrant colors, sharp clarity, and high resolution. Unfortunately, these qualities also make them susceptible to damage. Accidental knocks, drops, or even the pressure from improper handling can lead to cracks or shattered screens. Considering the premium nature of MacBook displays, repairing or replacing them can be a significant financial burden for users.

The Solution: iPhone Ceramic Shield for MacBooks
Drawing inspiration from the iPhone's ceramic shield technology, Apple could revolutionize MacBook display protection. By incorporating this advanced material into MacBook displays, Apple can significantly enhance their durability and resistance to damage. The ceramic shield, which is a blend of nano-ceramic crystals, offers exceptional strength and impact resistance, making it an ideal choice for safeguarding MacBook displays.

Benefits of Ceramic Shield Protection
Implementing iPhone's ceramic shield technology in MacBook displays brings forth several notable benefits, ensuring a more robust and resilient user experience.

• Enhanced Durability: Guarding Against Accidental Damage - The ceramic shield's outstanding durability provides an additional layer of protection for MacBook displays. It can withstand accidental knocks, bumps, and even minor drops, reducing the risk of cracks and shattered screens. With ceramic shield protection, MacBook users can enjoy a greater sense of confidence in the durability of their devices.
•  Retaining Display Clarity: Protecting Against Scratches - Scratches on a MacBook display can significantly diminish the viewing experience. With ceramic shield protection, MacBook users can bid farewell to the worries of scratches caused by everyday use. The ceramic shield's hardness and scratch resistance properties act as a shield, preserving the display's clarity and ensuring a pristine visual experience.
• Cost-Effective Solution: Saving on Repair Expenses - Repairing or replacing a damaged MacBook display can be an expensive affair. By implementing ceramic shield technology, Apple can potentially reduce the frequency of display damage incidents, leading to significant cost savings for users. The enhanced durability and damage resistance provided by ceramic shield protection can help mitigate the need for costly repairs or replacements.
• Consumer Demand and Market Potential - The introduction of ceramic shield protection for MacBook displays aligns with consumer expectations for robust and durable devices. As the demand for premium laptops continues to rise, Apple can position itself as an industry leader by addressing the vulnerability of MacBook displays. This move can potentially attract a broader consumer base and tap into a market segment that values durability and reliability.

Conclusion: Elevating MacBook Display Protection

Apple's MacBook displays are renowned for their premium quality, but their vulnerability to damage remains a concern for users. By exploring the implementation of iPhone's ceramic shield technology in MacBook displays, Apple could elevate display protection to new heights. Enhanced durability, maintenance of aesthetics, display clarity, and cost savings are among the compelling benefits that ceramic shield protection can bring. As Apple continues to innovate, this step could reinforce its commitment to delivering exceptional user experiences and solidify its position as a leader in the laptop market.

How M1 Pro Purchase is better than M2 Pro

When it comes to laptops, Apple's MacBook Pro series has always been a popular choice among professionals and creative individuals. With the recent release of the M2 Pro variant, many users were eager to upgrade to the latest model. However, upon closer inspection, it appears that the performance increase of the M2 Pro is not as significant as expected. In this article, we will explore why it may be a wise decision to choose the M1 Pro over the latest M2 Pro, considering the lack of considerable performance gains.

Overview of Apple MacBook Pro M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is the latest addition to Apple's MacBook Pro line-up, boasting powerful specifications and promising performance improvements. With its advanced M2 chip, it is expected to deliver blazing-fast speeds and superior processing capabilities. The M2 Pro also features an enhanced display, improved battery life, and updated software optimizations. Apple has marketed it as the ultimate choice for power users who demand top-notch performance for tasks such as video editing, 3D rendering, and heavy multitasking.

Performance Comparison of M1 Pro and M2 Pro

• While the M2 Pro undoubtedly comes with impressive specifications, the performance gain compared to the M1 Pro is not as substantial as anticipated. Benchmark tests and real-world usage reviews have shown that the performance difference between the M1 Pro and M2 Pro is marginal, and in some cases, the M1 Pro even outperforms the M2 Pro. This is due to various factors, including software optimizations, thermal throttling, and other hardware limitations.
• One of the main reasons for the lack of significant performance gains in the M2 Pro is the similarity in architecture and core specifications with the M1 Pro. Both chips are based on the same ARM-based architecture and offer similar CPU and GPU configurations. While the M2 Pro may have a slightly higher clock speed and more cache, the real-world performance difference is not noticeable in most use cases.
• Additionally, the M1 Pro already delivers exceptional performance in its own right, thanks to its efficient and powerful M1 chip. Many users find the performance of the M1 Pro more than sufficient for their needs, whether it's photo editing, video rendering, or other resource-intensive tasks. Therefore, the incremental performance gain of the M2 Pro may not justify the cost of upgrading from the M1 Pro, especially considering the hefty price tag associated with Apple products.

Factors to Consider in Choosing Between M1 Pro and M2 Pro
When deciding between the M1 Pro and M2 Pro, there are several factors to consider. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

• Budget: The M2 Pro is priced similar to M1 Pro, and the performance gain may not be worth the same cost for some users.
• Use Case: If you primarily use your MacBook Pro for everyday tasks such as web browsing, document editing, and email, the M1 Pro is more than capable of handling these tasks efficiently.
• Future-proofing: If you require cutting-edge performance for tasks that demand the latest hardware advancements, such as 8K video editing or machine learning, the M2 Pro may be a more suitable choice.
• Software Compatibility: As the M1 Pro and M2 Pro share the same architecture, most software and applications that run on the M1 Pro will also be compatible with the M2 Pro. Therefore, upgrading to the M2 Pro solely for software compatibility may not be necessary.

Benefits of Choosing M1 Pro Over M2 Pro  

While the M2 Pro may offer minor performance improvements over the M1 Pro, there are several benefits to choosing the latter version:

• Cost-effectiveness: The M1 Pro is priced lower than the M2 Pro in used market and some online stores even offer hefty discounts on available stocks, making it a more cost-effective option for users who want a high-performance MacBook Pro without breaking the bank.
• Proven Performance: The M1 Pro has already been proven to deliver exceptional performance in various tasks, and many users find it more than sufficient for their needs. Choosing the M1 Pro ensures that you are getting a reliable and powerful machine.
• Established Software Ecosystem: As the M1 Pro has been on the market for some time now, it has a well-established software ecosystem with numerous compatible applications and optimizations. This ensures smooth and seamless performance without any hiccups.
• Value for Money: Considering the marginal performance gains of the M2 Pro over the M1 Pro, choosing the latter version offers better value for money, as you can get a high-performing MacBook Pro at a lower cost.
• Future-proofing: While the M2 Pro may have some advantages in terms of future hardware advancements, the M1 Pro is still a capable machine that can handle most tasks efficiently. It is a more practical option for users who do not require cutting-edge performance and want to make a wise investment in their MacBook Pro.

My View
In conclusion, while the Apple MacBook Pro M2 Pro may come with impressive specifications and promises of enhanced performance, the lack of considerable performance gains compared to the M1 Pro makes it a wise decision to choose the latter version. The M1 Pro already delivers exceptional performance and offers better value for money, considering its lower cost and established software ecosystem. Unless you have specific requirements for cutting-edge performance or future hardware advancements, the M1 Pro is a reliable and powerful choice for your MacBook Pro needs. Don't miss out on my other great content! Head over to "G R Team Sites" to explore more such articles on various topics.

Apple Watch Series 7 Long Term Review: Frustrating Battery Life

Apple Watch Series 7 has been promoted as a revolutionary smartwatch that boasts enhanced functionalities, including an upgraded screen, fresh exercise modes, and a sturdier configuration. As a fervent Apple enthusiast, I was thrilled to experience this new iteration. Nevertheless, having utilized it for several months, I must confess that there is a significant drawback that has been causing me irritation: its battery performance.  

My Experience with Apple Watch Series 7 Battery Life:

• Being a person who relies on their Apple timepiece for regular tracking of their pulse and rest cycles, I realize that I have to charge my device at least twice daily. This is a significant inconvenience that disrupts my daily routine. Frequently, I have to remove my wristwatch in the middle of the day to recharge it, which contradicts the idea of owning a wearable gadget that is designed to simplify our lives.
• Frequently, I am compelled to remove my wristwatch during the middle of the day to power it up, which negates the reason for owning a wearable gadget that is designed to simplify life. I have experimented with various methods to prolong the battery's lifespan, including deactivating the constantly-on screen and switching off superfluous alerts. Nevertheless, despite implementing these modifications, I still need to charge my timepiece several times throughout the day. 

 Apple's Response to Battery Life Issues

• Although Apple has recognized that certain users are worried about battery longevity, they have not yet confronted this matter head-on. Instead, they suggest that users optimize their settings and charge their device more frequently. Nevertheless, this is not an enduring remedy for individuals who depend on their Apple Watch for prolonged duration.
• The Apple Watch Series 7 is an exceptional intelligent timepiece with a multitude of cutting-edge functions that render it a valuable expenditure. However, the frustrating battery life issue is a significant downside that Apple should address. Whether it's through enhancing their software or increasing battery capacity, a solution is needed to make this device more user-friendly.

Get more such insights and opinion from me through articles published in “G R Team Sites”

Microsoft's Early Exit from Mobile OS Market: A Missed Opportunity

Microsoft's entry into the mobile operating system market was marked by the launch of Windows Mobile in 2000. However, for many years, the platform and its mobile operating system failed to catch up. Eventually, Microsoft made the decision to withdraw from the market and focus on other initiatives.

Looking back, Microsoft's early exit from the mobile operating system market was a missed opportunity. The rise of smartphones and mobile devices has changed the way we live, work, and communicate, and with Apple's iOS App store and Android play-store monopoly, Microsoft's absence from the market was noticeable and most users can feel the impact of their absence. While Windows Mobile has its flaws, it's a solid platform and easy-to-use user interface offered a unique experience compared to other mobile operating systems of its time.

Had Microsoft continued to innovate and invest in the platform and fix the issues that plagued Windows Mobile devices and its operating system functionality, they could have competed with Apple’s iOS and Android by Google. Microsoft's rich experience and resources in software development and hardware design could have been leveraged to create a mobile operating system that truly stands out from the competition.

Additionally, Microsoft's strong presence in the enterprise market was missed to be leveraged to make Windows Mobile a popular choice for businesses and their employees. With the increasing use of mobile devices in the workplace, a powerful and secure mobile operating system that seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft Office suites of products and services would have been the game changer for the entire mobile industry.

My Final Thoughts
Ultimately, Microsoft's early exit from the mobile operating system market is a missed opportunity for both the company and heavy desktop users Check out "G R Team Sites" for more such articles and information

Successfully replaced my AirPods Pro for manufacturing defect

After coming to conclusion that my AirPods Pro has manufacturing defect and may be eligible for FREE replacement, I have scheduled my visit to Apple Service Center. Before visiting Apple service center, I was little bit anxious about whether my AirPods Pro would be rejected due to increased scratches and few dents. However, to my surprise the AirPods Pro was accepted with just mention of usable scratches and they would call me for further updates. Following is the list of updates throughout the replacement process

• Day 1 - No update: After accepting my AirPods Pro to validate whether the product is eligible for FREE replacement, I was notified that they would call me about the status of the repair and would be notified if the claim were rejected. Post this communication, I was little bit nervous and was anxiously waiting for the updates. However, there was no update from the service center and after follow-up call late in the evening, I was notified that the update would be communicated in the day.
• Day 2 & 3 – Product sent to Apple for Validation: Again, on the second day, there was no communication or update from the service center and I anxiously skipped the entire day hoping for a call from the service center. Post no update from the service center on the second day, I called up directly to service center to check on the update and was notified that the product has been sent to Apple technical center for validation and would take 5-6 days for acknowledgment.
• Day 5 – Status update in 2 days and Apple has registered shipment: I was anxiously waiting for past 5 days to get a status update for my AirPods Pro replacement and there was not a single communication from service center. I was not able to wait for another couple more days and I called up service center directly to check on the update. The response from service center was that Apple has made shipment regarding my service case and they would know only after it reaches the service center in next few days, and I would be notified about it at the earliest.
• Day 6 – Product replaced and can be collected: After knowing that there was a shipment from Apple, I was even more anxious to know more about the status of my service case and called up service center for the update. To my surprise I was notified that my both AirPods Pro headphones are replaced for FREE, and I can collect the product at my convenience.

I was completely out of the world after knowing that my AirPods Pro was replaced for FREE, even after using it for past 18 months (about 1 and a half years) and completely new headphones would extend the life of the product by 3 more years. To read more such articles please visit “G R Team Sites”

iCloud and OneDrive folders & files integration

With evolution of cloud storage solutions across devices, it has now become easier to store your important and regular files over cloud. However, the integration of OneDrive in MacBook or MAC operating system is much lower compared to the native windows operating system. I use MAC as my primary device and have OneDrive subscription for my files back-up. However, there are few restrictions while integrating OneDrive into my MAC system and wanted to detail the following features to be included in the upcoming updates. 

• Folder backups integration between OneDrive & iCloud: In addition to OneDrive as my primary cloud storage option, I also use iCloud basic tier subscription plan as my secondary back-up storage option and store my important files in iCloud. However, the folders stored in iCloud cannot be directly synchronized with OneDrive and the specific OneDrive folders cannot be synchronized directly into iCloud.

• iPhone backup to OneDrive Folder: In MAC operating system there is no option to enable all backups to be directly stored in OneDrive and there are few alternative options to enable back-ups to OneDrive. However, all those options are not reliable and there are no system preferences to change the backup location to Cloud by default. 

Apple should allow its users to enable them to back-up their critical and preferred files to other trusted cloud storage service providers like OneDrive. Read more such articles from “G R Team Sites”

Disadvantages in OneDrive Cloud storage or plan

I have been detailing for a long time in my articles of my desire to move towards reliable and most affordable online cloud storage choice. After well thought and dragging decision for a long time, I have decided to opt for Microsoft's OneDrive as my preferred online cloud storage platform for its affordability and exclusive access to office applications. However, post migration to OneDrive, there is specific disadvantage of the platform when installed on MAC and wanted to detail the same to my readers. 

• Lack of choice to select specific folders in MAC: I use Apple's MacBook pro as my preferred laptop for both business and personal use and have no intentions of moving back to Windows operating system in near future. Post installation of OneDrive to my MAC, the most annoying part was, it had defined folders in it and had no preferences/options available to either select or discard specified folder inside my MAC. I had to copy and paste each file(s) into OneDrive's folder for it to sync across devices and when there is change in files architecture or update in the document, the changed files or updated document to be manually moved to the OneDrive‘s online folder. Also, OneDrive does not allow users to backup system files or back up critical system files to OneDrive folder. 

The above detailed problems should be addressed by OneDrive at the earliest, so when users like me, who are first time paid subscribers and users from Mac operating system feel comfortable. For more such articles, please feel free to check out the G R Team Sites.

Comparison of Apple Smart watch and Android smart wearables

For a long time, I wanted to get smart watch wearable for health tracking and with recent COVID situation, I think it has become essential to have smart health device handy. In continuation to get smart watch, I was doing some analysis to make my decision subjective and wanted to detail my readers regarding the same.

	Apple smart watch	Android smart wearables
Price	Expensive	Affordable
Health tracking	Trusted and reliable	Glitchy and need consistency.
Mobile connectivity	Exclusive to iPhones but works fluidly.	Support for both iOS and android, but not as fluid
Applications support	Have dedicated apps.	Apps supports but needs enhancements.
Stand-out options	ECG  Heart rate monitoring  Workout monitoring   Accurate health tracking  Breathe exercise.  Stress monitoring	Affordability and few features similarity to Apple Watch
Battery life	Poor and often stands only for a day.	Good and often provides battery life for few days.
Charging options	No wireless charging option and limited only to OEM cables.	Wireless charging option and can be charged through universal cables.

For more such comparisons, please feel free to check out the blog posts published in G R Team Sites.

 

Predictions for upcoming AirPods 3 in 2021

I have been detailing my expectations on Apple products in the earlier blog posts published on my other sites, this blog post will be in continuation on this topic. From recent April 21 event from Apple, the most expected product that Apple had missed to reveal was AirPods 3 or next generation AirPods Pro. So, here are my expectations around the product. 

• Updated version of AirPods: The recent design leaks suggest that the next version of AirPods is going to be updated version of AirPods 2. The next version of AirPods may even be called at AirPods 3. 
• Design changes: The updated version of AirPods is going to have completely modern design and the case resembling like AirPods Pro. The modern design will enable AirPods 3 also to support the spatial audio option and offer improved battery performance. 
• Pricing: The updated AirPods 3 version pricing will be in between AirPods 2 and AirPods Pro. Also, the pricing will be almost same as AirPods 2 and the current AirPods 2 pricing will be reduced, to keep it as the base version of AirPods line up. 

If you are looking to read more such expectations on Apple products, please feel free to check out the blog posts listed on G R Team Sites.

Looking for alternative option for swollen MacBook pro battery

My MacBook Pro battery looked swollen, and I tried to resolve it by opening the back panel and checked out connections and removed some screws underneath the swollen section to further save the lifespan. However, after finding out from research that it is not advisable to continue the usage and the battery swollen was increasing by each day with normal usage. I had two options left, one is to either replace the battery or to replace the laptop with complete new one. With budgetary constraints, I had no option available other than to replace the batteries in my old MacBook Pro and ensure that the battery is compatible. Since I have been using 2012 MacBook Pro, the OEM battery option was ruled out, as Apple has stopped the manufacturing of older version of batteries and finding reliable battery available in online shopping network is one of the most complicated process. To know more of how I bought battery for my MacBook Pro, please feel free to check the blog posts listed in “G R Team Sites” 

Possibility to get a new phone and using Android Phone

With my iPhone 6 starting to be slowing down a lot and my daughter threw the phone to shatter its screen. After a few days of working, my iPhone 6 finally gave up and did not turn on after being in charge of the whole night. I got two options, one option is to get iPhone 11 at a premium price, or the other option is, use my wife’s phone for a few more months and wait till the next generation phone is launched by Apple. I chose the second option of using my wife’s phone for a few more months and receive the latest version of the iPhone, provided the price is the same as the earlier version or marginally higher. Before, I detail my decision on getting a new iPhone, the usage of android after a long time was taking a toll on me, and I was frustrated about using an android phone. It was due to complicated permissions and each app requesting permission for access to the gallery. Please feel free to check out the blog posts in “G R Team Sites,” to know more about my buying decision on a new phone.

No updates from on-site team even after multiple reminders

After waiting for the whole day to get an update from the on-site team, I had no other option left but to drop a note to the on-site team stating that I can support only for next few days and post that I have planned vacation coming up and the delivery team has to take ownership. In addition, I have also mentioned that with no updates for each version shared, from the on-site team, it is getting difficult for the offshore team to work on the rough drafts and make iterative changes. With these strong words, I was also getting nervous about its impact, as it would result in two different outcomes. The positive outcome would be that the on-site team would take ownership and offshore team can support where and when requested, the negative outcome would be, the on-site lead will request me to schedule daily calls to review the document and would provide unnecessary iterative changes. After sending the mail to the on-site team, I was checking the mail anxiously for any further updates or any acknowledgment from the team confirming whether we are on the right track or further modifications required to match client requirements. The next day with so much anxiety, I was opening my laptop to check mails for any further updates or acknowledgment; to my astonishment, I do not have any mails from the on-site team even after sending so many emails and reminders with clear instructions of my upcoming vacation plans. To know more about how I tackled this service request without affecting my vacation, please feel free to check out “G R Team Sites”

Remote RC cars information

If you were looking to buy high quality and best remote control cars available in market, then make sure that you check out best online network available in market. The nitrogenrc.com is one of the stand-alone online networks available in market that help users to find wide collection and quality nitro rc cars. The nitrogenrc.com online network ensures that users find high quality and wide collection of nitro remote cars available in market that no other competitor in its class could offer you.

Best information to Block ads

In recent times, the online users should be aware of the ads that were loading on the web page. As now the Ads are widely used for scamming and circulation of viruses and malware, Ads often distort the appearance of web pages and a lot more attack to the system. In such case, the Ad-guard from quality network would be the quality option, that the Adguard removes ads, speeds up the loading of pages and reduces traffic. The ad-blocker from myadguard.com online network would be the one that people should check out to find quality and best ad blocker available in market. The ad blocker ie 8 would be smart option for people who were looking to stop the annoying advertisements in web page. The ie8 ad blocker ensures and prevents from any advertisements loading in web page and preventing the pop up ads opening in the browser. The chrome ad blocker were specifically designed to work on the Google chrome browser with same features that were available with IE ad blocker. The other major feature of the ad blocker from myadguard.com online network is that it works with all browsers like Internet Explorer (IE), Opera, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, etc.

Suggestion on getting Quality Links

You may have known different ways to promote your site in search engines and the smart way would be getting quality backlinks. The quality backlinks would actually help the site in search results. So, it is essential to get quality backlinks from best online networks to promote the site in web. You may have come across various online networks in web that promises to offer quality backlinks for its consumers. But most online networks do not keep up their promises and may lack page rank links offered. The VoltRank would be the smart option for most users in web who are interested to get quality backlinks from stand-alone online network. The VoltRank.com online network has been specialised in various features such as the founders of VoltRank.com online network have been in the SEO business for almost 10 years and the VoltRank Link Exchange program was developed to help out the users who are looking to get quality links ad the ultimate goal of the program was to save users time, money and frustration by automating the link building process, allowing them to focus on other tactics. The VoltRank online network also ensures that it takes the time burden of link building off of you by automating the process and also understands the importance of link growth appearing natural in the eyes of search engines. The Voltrank.com online network does not eave any footprints behind for search engine to find out and also gives users various exciting options such as the ability to control daily and monthly growth limits as well as the ability to put their campaign on pause once they have reached global limit. If you were interested to make your link building process easier and simpler than ever before, then backlinks from quality networks like VoltRank.com would be the best option.